Pitching media – Email is still the way to go

As a PR pro, I’m always aiming to keep up with the rapidly evolving world of social media, and how it relates to what I do as a communicator. That’s why I have spent a lot of time debating (with myself, for the most part) whether or not I could effectively pitch a journalist through Twitter – a one-liner explaining the angle/why it’s a story, and a link to the presser, in essence.

I’ve never actually tried it, though I had been slanting toward the side of “yes, this could be very effective” – especially for pitching a journalist who uses Twitter frequently and as more than a story distribution channel.

While this may not be frowned on, per se, I got the answer from a journalist who is very engaging on Twitter – and that answer, in short, was “no”.

Matt Hartley, AKA @TheHartley, FP Tech Desk Editor at the National Post, spoke on a panel hosted by Business Wire on October 25 – “National Post Editorial Briefing Session – Press Release Optimization for Newspapers.” He, along with Hollie Shaw, AKA@FPhollisha, Marketing Editor and Retailing Reporter, Financial Post, and Grant Ellis, Managing Editor, National Post, provided some great insight on how to grab their attention and get your story covered, in an age where they are bombarded with literally hundreds of pitches in their inboxes and on their answering machines every day. How to stand out from the pack, if you will. You can view the session here, and if you are looking to hone your pitching skills it is a very worthwhile watch.

At the end of the panel session, there was some time for Q&A, so I jumped on the opportunity to ask Matt how he felt about being pitched over Twitter. My question was posed simply as “Matt, you mentioned getting pitches through Twitter – I was just wondering, how do you feel about that? Is it effective at all?”

During the panel he had mentioned that he receives pitches through a wide variety of mediums, from LinkedIn to Twitter, to even the odd Facebook message – so getting pitched through Twitter is clearly something he has experience with.

His answer, put simply, was that Twitter is a great way to connect with him – start, build, and maintain a relationship with him – which, in my mind, could very well help when it comes to pitching him using more traditional methods. However, he is not a fan of receiving pitches through Twitter as it puts him in a bit of an awkward position where he either has to publicly reply telling the person he’s not interested, or ignore the tweet, which he is even less a fan of.

Here’s Matt in his own words:
“Twitter’s a really good place to reach me sort of first off; I don’t tend to conduct a lot of business over Twitter is what I tend to say. I hate when people send me something in the public on Twitter and say ‘hey, let’s meet up for a coffee, I’d love to tell you about my company’, because then if I write back and say no, everyone can read it and I look like a jerk. So, I always try to tell people to email me if they can. My email is at the bottom of every story that I write, and it’s also on the website – it’s really easy to find…”

He goes on to say:
“Twitter is usually a good place to sort of get introduced to me – it’s also a good place to see what interests me because we obviously tweet every story that we write, so it has a good feed of everything from the Tech Desk…”

So, the moral of the story is: Twitter can be a great way to connect with journalists and foster a relationship with them, but when it comes to sending pitches, email is your best option. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule, and my advice would be to simply ask a journalist you’re pitching what their preference is for receiving pitches. I’ve found that asking a journalist simple things like that can go a long way in getting on their good side ;) .

You can view the entire Business Wire briefing session here (note: you will have to enter some basic information to get in, but it takes seconds, literally). There is some great information to be pulled from it so it’s worth the watch if you’re looking to hone your media relations skills and hear what’s what right from the editors themselves.

Have you ever used Twitter to effectively pitch a story? What other ways do you use Twitter in your media relations efforts? Please share in the comments!

Locating online influencers – part two: determining who is actually influential

Locating online influencers – part two: determining who is actually influential

Welcome back to our online influencer series! If you missed part one, be sure to read it first here.

Where we left off
Now that we’ve pulled together a solid list of potential influencers as outlined in part one, we can begin to determine which influencers will become a part of our outreach and rank them based on a number of variants.

The first thing we must do before we can really even begin to judge whether someone is influential or not, however, will be to look at some of the top-level data that is readily available to us. The first thing I always do is look at a few things that are easy to locate:

  • Number of Twitter followers
  • Number of times they are listed on Twitter by other users
  • Number of “Likes” on their Facebook fan page
  • Number of inbound links to their site. This can be found by searching “link:sitename.com” in Google (see image below). The number of results returned will give you the number of inbound links for that site

Building your target influencer list
Using the simple methods listed above, you can start to eliminate bloggers from your list that don’t boast reasonable numbers (what is considered reasonable is, ultimately, up to you to decide). You will figure out what is average, and what is considered “good” after doing this with a few of your potential influencers. Take it from there…

In the chart below, I would immediately remove “The Tech Blog” from this list. I would also likely remove “TechABC” as well, though I would need to find data for a larger list of potential influencers before I would make that decision (to determine just how good or bad TechABC’s numbers actually are). Chances are that TechABC would be cut from the list as well.

(Click the image to view larger version)

Use the steps below to ensure that your influencer list includes only those that are actually influential:

  • What kind of content is the person creating and sharing (quality, focus/niche, credible and sourced, etc.)?
  • Of the lists that Twitter users have added them to, is there a common theme/niche? For example, have they been added to several lists focused on technology? If so, they are likely influential about technology, which is why people listed them in the first place.
  • How does the content they create relate to what you are planning to achieve? The most effective blogs are often tailored to a very niche audience – is their blog attracting the group of people you want to reach?
  • What kind of engagement does their blog receive – comments? Discussions between readers through the comments?
  • Are people sharing the content through their own networks? (Through Google +1, Facebook “Likes”, Twitter, etc. – this can most often be seen by a counter next to its respective button)
  • Is their content ever picked up, or linked to by other bloggers or even major news outlets?
  • Perhaps most importantly, are they seen as credible? (A look at the tone of the comments and the kinds of comments the blog receives should give an indication of this. People won’t be afraid to speak their mind if they think the writer is full of it).

If you follow all of the steps outlined in this article and do your research, you should be well on your way to a strategically targeted online influencer outreach campaign. It is very important, however, that you recognize that checking online influence and building lists is an ongoing process, and it should be revisited regularly.

It is also important to note that some people who may not be overly active online can have a lot of influence offline. These people should not be overlooked! They can be found on LinkedIn, or through traditional news stories (among many other, more traditional methods – that’s for another post all together, though) and can play a major role in your online efforts, even though they are mostly influential offline-only.

Have you already completed an online influencer campaign in the past? If so, how did you determine influencers? Please add your thoughts and tips in the comments!

Small Business Social Media Marketing – sometimes quality means more than quantity

There is little debate about the power of inbound social media marketing. Major brands are benefitting from massive online audiences that not only find them on their own, but are attentive in listening to the brand’s messaging. What’s more, much like ambassadors, many of these “audience” members often share brand messages with their own networks – spreading these messages even further, while adding a little third-party credibility, too.

I think we can all agree, online marketing programs can, and often do, deliver massive results that generate leads and result in business.

A common misconception, however, is that these programs must reach large numbers of people to be considered successful. Ford Motor Company has been very successful in its online initiatives, and indeed has some impressive numbers to back that statement up. Social media site Mashable did a small case study on one of Ford’s most recent campaigns which was aimed at raising awareness and buzz around the 2012 Focus – check out the case study; the numbers speak for themselves.

Does this tell us then that businesses need to attract millions of viewers to their YouTube channel, or thousands of visitors daily to their blog to be successful? In my opinion, the answer is no.

Organizations that deal in things with less mass appeal than things like cars, or technology, for example, are seeing huge increases in business leads, with a fraction of the online audience that big brands like Ford have.  The key for them isn’t the size of their audience, but rather who is actively watching/reading/listening. Niche market businesses can, in fact, see great success through inbound marketing, if done right. Good content and an SEO strategy are the main ingredients, but that’s another topic entirely.

If I asked you if a small fencing company in the town of Littleton, MA would benefit from a blog would you answer yes?

Louis E. Page is a small, family owned and operated fencing company that has had a great deal of success through its blog – experiencing an increase in sales leads of 850 percent since its launch. Yes, 850 percent!  This example is a bit old now (from 2009), but it’s still a great example of how a niche market, small business can benefit from an online marketing strategy, without attracting hundreds of thousands of readers to its blog and viewers to its videos. If anything, this is even truer now in 2011 as more people get online and turn to blogs, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and the likes for information.

Do you know of a niche-market business that has benefitted from an online marketing strategy? If so, please share in the comments!